A new study has put astrologer to the test , ultimately determining that they are convinced in what they are read , but no better at it than random chance .

Astrologymentions the planets and star a lot , so can soundsort of skill - yto laypeople , until you begin looking into it . In fact ,   Gallup and YouGov study found that about 25 per centum of Americans believe that the movements of star and planets can affect multitude ’s sprightliness through some unknown chemical mechanism .

There have been manyscientific testsof star divination , and yet zero evidence has been produce in its favor .

One squad , earlier this yr , attempt yet another subject area to see if there was any lustiness to it , though of course not bear to find any . They look at a number of characteristics of 308 citizenry ( from religionism to political persuasion ) and various living outcomes ( such as their mental upbeat , achievements , and how busy their social lives were ) .

Using zodiac house , they constitute no connexion . However , they were pick apart by astrologer for using Sun augury , whereas astrologers say they utilize " entire astrological charts " . The team adjudicate to work out with six astrologist to produce a better mental testing , to see whether astrologist could cope with people to their astrological charts .

The trial , which is stillavailable to takeif you think you have astrological acquirement , was then put to 152 astrologer to see if they could perform better than random . The team found that more experienced astrologers were more confident about how many of the 12 citizenry they had aright assigned to their genius mark . However , this added confidence did not understand to good execution , and they all performed in line with what you would expect from picking an astrological chart out of a chapeau . Those who considered themselves a " humans - class expert " imagine 2.2 out of 12 aright on average .

" If astrologers as a group had been able to do meaningfully easily than chance , this study invention would have supported the close that astrology works , " the authors explained in a web log military post . " But , as it wrench out , astrologers in the subject perform in a fashion statistically indistinguishable from random guesswork . "

The team was able to look at how astrologers from unlike schools of star divination ( for example Formosan , westerly , Mayan , and Renaissance ) perform . They ascertain that Hellenistical astrologers nonplus the most correct , 2.9 out of a possible 12 , but this was still statistically in line with guesswork .

The team attempted to find out whether , though they were faulty in their assessments , astrologer at least agree with each other . For instance , did they all find fault the same incorrect result .

" The understanding rates among astrologers are very low , set out from about 21 percent to 28 percentage depending on experience level , " the team explained . " This suggest there is short consensus among astrologers when interpreting the same charts , even among those with high level of experience . "

The team describe a phone number of limitation of the subject area , which has not been peer refresh , including that the astrologist ' experience grade was self - reported , and that no individual study is definitive .

" An case-by-case bailiwick can only provide secure evidence related to a title , not definitive proof , " the team concluded . " Every subject area , including this one , should be interpreted in the linguistic context of other grounds . "

Unfortunately for astrologer , all the evidence ( includingfar expectant studies ) so far points to no validity to their claims .

The study ’s results are post toClearer Thinking .