in the first place today , Cult of Mac postedthe most egregious rumor : Apple is evidently crafting a pair of special edition augment reality glasses that will look like Steve Jobs ’s moderately iconic one . Apple will then reportedly sell these glasses for money . The title comes from Jon Prosser , a YouTuber who has made waves in the last few month with some incredibly exact predictions regarding Apple ’s business . I ’m dark , y’ all . This is bullshit .
To be clear , I do not have privileged noesis of Apple ’s AR glasses labor . I have touch out to Apple for comment , but the society does not annotate on future products , so do n’t hold your breath for either a confirmation or denial . But it ’s a well - document hearsay that Apple is developing a pair of AR glasses for consumers , and it ’s no closed book that Apple deoxyephedrine — in whatever form they take — are expected in the first half of this decade . Last year , a build of stereoscopic AR was discovered in the computer code for iOS , spawn rumour of an impendent release date . However , nothing else has materialise but more rumors .
Last week , Prosserteasedthat he ’d really see a pair of Apple ’s glasses and said they would be shown off in the summer of 2021 ( around the fourth dimension of Apple ’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference ) . He even claimedhe’d shortly show off the UI for the glasses . This calendar week , heteased the glasses more , but when his TV finally appeared , the proof was … missing . He said he was holding it until his lawyers gave the go - ahead .
A noted leaker claims Apple is fashioning a pair of AR glasses modeled after these minimalist frames.Photo: Justin Sullivan (Getty Images)
Instead , he packaged love rumors , including that the AR oculus sinister is codenamed Starboard , with new tantalizing nugget : the drinking glass will utilise LiDAR instead of traditional television camera , the price will get going at $ 500 , and they will be release in late 2021 or other 2022 .
https://gizmodo.com/what-is-lidar-and-why-would-you-want-it-on-your-phone-1843162463
The LiDAR title in particular seems to confine urine . Apple made a big show of let in LiDAR inthis year ’s iPad Prospecifically for AR purposes . LiDAR captures spacial informationinstead of visual information , so it would be a not bad fast one to get around privacy concerns ( though it would still be able-bodied to capture plenty of selective information that may leave the privacy - focused consumer untrusting ) .
But there is a big and incredibly important element of the AR looking glass teaser that remains miss . How the heck are these field glass going to protrude information that you could see ? Microsoft ’s Hololens 2 and the Magic Leap headset both create decently immersive AR environments with a theatre of operations of vista about the size of four stamp postage stamp and need to be stupidly enormous and goofy attend to even extract that off . North produces a brace of AR glasses that face , to the modal soul , like a steady pair of spyglass . But the image the user sees is decidedly 2D — nothing like the big AR set - pieces Apple likes to show off . And the subject of eyeshot on North ’s crank is even smaller than on the Hololens and Magic Leap — it takes up just a tiny amount of distance on a individual genus Lens .
https://gizmodo.com/how-science-fiction-ruined-smart-glasses-1840035930
right smart back in 2017 , Apple CEO Tim Cook toldThe Independentthat the projector technology was a fully grown reason Apple had n’t set in motion a span of AR specs yet :
The field of view , the quality of the display itself , it ’s not there yet , ” he says . And as with all of its product , Apple will only ship something if it feel it can do it “ in a quality way . ”
“ We do n’t give a so-and-so ’s about being first , we want to be the proficient , and give people a great experience , ” he says . “ But now anything you would see on the marketplace any time before long would not be something any of us would be quenched with . Nor do I retrieve the immense bulk of people would be satisfied . ”
unluckily , very footling has changed on that front . AR glasses still want to be moderately chunky to pack in even a flyspeck projector , like the one found in the Focals by North . A lot of fiddling has to be done to fine-tune AR methamphetamine to a person ’s vision , too .
No one has efficaciously solved those problems yet — although Apple , with its billions , certainly has the cash to befuddle at it . But Apple is n’t in the business of creating a whole new engineering science for its products . Landmark achievements like the iPhone , iPod , and even the Apple Watch are built on the back of other innovators . Apple has an unbelievable knack for package raw technology into a figure that anyone can pick up and use , but the technology has to really exist .
https://gizmodo.com/the-future-of-the-face-computer-1840153270
You should keep all of that in brain when you consider the positively bullshit claim that Apple is take a shit a pair of glasses fashioned after Steve Job ’s lean frames and sell as a heritage version in his name .
First , there ’s the sheer viscidity of the concept . Then there ’s just the technical implausibility . The technology does not exist to load down all the necessary components for AR glasses into something as small as the frames wear by Jobs . That means the glasses would need to be a lot bulkier . A lot bulkier . That takes us back to the gaudy factor . I mean , I know former Apple design chief Jony Ives is n’t involved in the twenty-four hour period to daytime still , but are you shitting me ? !
Prosser ’s course book of the past few month may give some acceptance to the rumour of an impending AR glasses launching , but the Steve Jobs 2.0 pattern feel a nosepiece too far for me . And Mark Gurman , a Bloomberg newsperson with one of the most consistent criminal record on Apple leaks in the business concern , agree .
Do I even ask to say that this ( along with the repose of the Apple AR glass narration in the past week ) is terminated fiction?https://t.co / oLK3VVbz8H
— Mark Gurman ( @markgurman)May 21 , 2020
Prosser has since doubled down , claiming that he ’ll see Gurman “ next yr . ” But my money ’s on Gurman , who , aboard noted psychoanalyst Ming Chi - Kuo , predictthat Apple ’s AR glasses will launch in 2022 at the infrangible earliest(whichprompted Prosser ’s AR leakfest ) .
If you know something about Apple ’s AR glass , or what exalt this absolutely ridiculous rumor , finger costless to slide into my inbox at[email protected]or[email protect ] . you may also reach out viaTwitter DM . Or off me up for my Signal number .
AppleAugmented reality
Daily Newsletter
Get the good tech , science , and culture news in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
