America used bad science to justify torture

A group of physicians and human right militant claim that the United States authorities used shoddy and intentionally biased scientific discipline so as to downgrade what was considered distortion to “ enhanced question proficiency . ”

grant to the radical , much of the enquiry cited in okaying these “ EITs ” came from grooming that was used to prepare soldiers to have these same techniques being used on them if they were conquer . Also , the training was based on situation where the soldier would be submit to the techniques only for very limited fourth dimension full point , in a reduced manner , had given their consent , and were able-bodied to stop their participation at any fourth dimension . No attending was given to the retentive term psychological impact of elongated inquiry .

They also repoint the inculpation at doctors complicit in the situation , for not pick out the realness that the detainees in their aid were being tortured , regardless of what the military might say — a prospect reward by the examination of detainees according to external standards for the medical documentation of torture , which showed decipherable evidence of abuse .

Greenworks